Viện Nghiên cứu Chính sách và Chiến lược

CỔNG THÔNG TIN KINH TẾ VIỆT NAM

Tin mới

Scoring for more efficient investment (18/7)

18/07/2012 - 22 Lượt xem

These conditions were scored and based on the scored points, the Ministry of Planning and Investment has selected five groups of coastal EZs to prioritize investment in the period 2013-2015.
The first group includes Chu Lai and Dung Quat EZs in the provinces of Quang Nam and Quang Ngai. These two EZs are located next to each other and can support each other. Dung Quat EZ has Oil Refinery 1 while Chu Lai EZ has the Truong Hai Automobile Factory. Both EZs are located in the central key economic zone.
The second group includes Dinh Vu-Cat Hai EZ in Hai Phong which is regarded as a multi-sectoral EZ, utilizing the Lach Huyen Port, and located in the northern key economic zone.
 The third group includes Phu Quoc Island and An Thoi Archipelago EZ in Kien Giang Province, with huge potential for tourism and related services.
The fourth group includes Nghi Son EZ in Thanh Hoa Province, with potential for heavy industrial development. One of its main focuses is the Oil Refinery 2.
The fifth group includes Vung Ang EZ in Ha Tinh Province, also with potential for heavy industrial development. One of its main focuses is the Formosa Ha Tinh Steel Corporation that is using iron ores from the Thach Khe Mine.
Ministry of Planning and Investment's Department of EZ Management Director Vu Dai Thang said, "In the near future, these five EZ groups are prioritized with development-oriented mechanism, preferential policies to attract investment in their development and operation, while the remaining EZs will not be removed, but selected for reasonable development in consistence with the Government's current available resources and policies to cut public investment."
Representatives from ministries and coastal EZs highly appreciated the Ministry of Planning and Investment's initiative and regard it as an appropriate solution to develop coastal economic zones under the condition that public investment funds are limited as at present.
However, representatives of some coastal EZs argued that these conditions were insufficient and need to add some more. Chief of Binh Dinh EZ Management Board Man Ngoc Ly insisted, "In addition to these five score-winning conditions, it is needed to add another one that any province of lower budget revenues than other provinces will get a higher score, in order to create more favorable conditions for provinces still with difficult economic conditions.
He suggested that the scoring periods should be short and diversified with new criteria for evaluating coastal EZs so as to encourage them to compete with one another. Besides, unselected EZs should be classified into two groups: one included newly established EZs and one included long established EZs, to make it easier to give sensible priority.
Vice Chairman of Quang Ninh Province Nguyen Van Thanh said, "The Ministry of Planning and Investment's five given conditions mainly focus on heavy industrial development without paying attention to the service and tourism sectors, which seems unsuitable for all coastal EZs. For example, our Van Don EZ in Quang Ninh Province has huge potential to develop tourism as it is located in an area with the world natural wonder Halong and regarded as having strategic position in the north's tourism development plan. Therefore, it should be given priority in this period."
Vice Chairman of Ca Mau EZ Management Board Nguyen Tan Kiet agreed, "Coastal EZ groups prioritized by the Government are important. Our Nam Can Coastal EZ in Ca Mau Province is not conditionally enough to get the Government's investment priority now but surely to be able to fully meet these conditions in the near future as we are favored with important seaways and a deep-water port to be built.
Asst. Prof. Dr. Tran Dinh Thien from the Vietnam Institute of Economics said that "The current state budget can not cover all the EZs' expenses at this time and therefore we should perform a priority selection. However, ineffectively operating coastal EZs can not be closed because they are national precious property. The most difficult problem now is how to deal with the remaining EZs so that they may continue to effectively develop./.

Source: VEN